5 / 24
(a) does it avoid or minimise harm to the significance of the
heritage asset or its setting?
(b) does it avoid detrimental fragmentation of management of
the heritage asset?
(c) will it will secure the long term future of the heritage asset
and, where applicable, its continued use for a sympathetic
purpose?
(d) it is necessary to resolve problems arising from the
inherent needs of the heritage asset, rather than the
circumstances of the present owner, or the purchase price
paid?
(e) is sufficient subsidy not available from any other source?
(f) has it been demonstrated that the amount of development
is the minimum necessary to secure the future of the heritage
asset and that its form minimises harm to other public
interests?
(g) does the public benefit of securing the future of the
significant heritage asset through such enabling development
decisively outweigh the disbenifits of breaching other public
policies?